Archive for November, 2009

30
Nov

Gartner recognizes open source as enterprise data integration

Some will say “it’s about time”.  I won’t.  Although I’ll admit that I was impatient to see the Magic Quadrant for Data Integration been released.  It’s finally out, and well worth the wait.

But before getting into more details, I want to set some points straight.

Last year, I posted on this blog a comment on Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant for Data Integration. This was perceived by some as a direct attack against Gartner analysts, an unprecedented action from a vendor according to an AR firm: Vendor complains in a very public blog post about Gartner’s Data Integration Magic Quadrant.  A lively discussion ensued, mostly with Gartner analyst Andreas Bitterer (Setting the Record Straight) and many other parties chimed in – analysts, vendors, etc.

I still stand behind what I said.  I feel that Talend’s instant traction a year ago should have been sufficient to get us in the Quadrant. Gartner’s policy is to look at previous years’ record. I disagree with this policy, but it’s clearly stated and applied fairly and objectively.  This is what’s important.

The second thing I feel I need to say, is that Talend is not a Gartner client.  I have seen many implications amounting to “you have to pay to be included”.  Well, I can affirm loud and clear that this is not true. At the time I write this post, Talend has never paid a penny to Gartner.  All this inclusion has cost us is time, convincing, sweat, stress – but it did not dent my marketing budget.

These past few months of interacting with Ted Friedman, Mark Beyer and Andy Bitterer have been very interesting.  The Magic Quadrant process is a well oiled mechanic, and the analysts are clear on what to expect.  Along the process, a few other research notes mentioning Talend have seen the light of day. One such report was on open source data quality, on which Jeff Kelly of SearchDataManagement.com has written, quoting Ted Friedman: “The most advanced of the open source vendors offering data quality tools is Talend”.  Another recent note by Gartner is titled “2009 Sees Increased Adoption of Open-Source Data Integration Tools” – but not been a Gartner client I don’t know precisely what it says.  I just know from gartner.com’s search engine that it mentions Talend.

Back to the new Magic Quadrant.  I got a courtesy copy from Gartner but obviously can’t and won’t share copyrighted material on this blog.  A few things which are important though:

  • Talend is coming into the Quadrant as a Visionary.  In itself this is quite an accomplishment: many new entrants start as Niche Players and then slowly make their way to the right – if at all.  I’ll take that as a recognition that the commercial open source model enables a different delivery and development model.
  • Talend is the only new entrant in the Quadrant this year, and obviously the only open source player in it.  Many vendors (proprietary or open source) have been trying to ride in the wake we created, as seen in numerous press releases and articles (“we are like Talend, except that…”).  They are not there yet.  Personally, I would love to see another open source player in the Quadrant, if only to reinforce the proof of the enterprise readiness of open source data integration.

What does that mean for Talend?  Is this a life-changing event?  I don’t believe so.  We acquired 800 enterprise customers, reached 5 million downloads, without this kind of coverage.  Still, is it going to help us in large enterprise accounts?  You bet it will.  Many CIOs, when they’ll get this report on their desk, will want to know more about us, and especially figure out how Talend can help them optimize their costs and increase flexibility.  We’ll be happy to tell them.  And to give them examples of how their peers have done it.  The same ones we presented to Gartner in the past year.  (Kind of chicken-egg story).

In any case, I am proud that Talend is joining the handful of open source companies recognized by Gartner in a Magic Quadrant.  Others who made it include Alfresco (Enterprise Content Management), Drupal, Liferay & MindTouch (Social Software in the Workplace), GroundWork (Network Management), MySQL (DBMS).  And I would be surprised if our friends at Jaspersoft and Pentaho did not make the next BI Quadrant.  They certainly deserve it and have the track record.

And, as Matt Asay recently wrote, maybe it’s time to upgrade open source perceptions of Gartner

Yves

** UPDATE Dec 1, 2009 **
You can now view the full Magic Quadrant report, courtesy of Talend, by clicking here.

20
Nov

Open source continues to conquer, but always conveys the same platitudes

I recently read the results of a survey by Computer Weekly and ResearchNow Business. The Computer Weekly IT Panel was launched in April 2009 and comprises almost 4,000 IT professionals working in a range of organization types, size, and business sectors.

These results confirm the growing adoption of open source technologies, and attribute it to the weak economic environment. To the question: In light of the economy, how likely is it that your business will use open source software in the future? only 29% of companies replied that they do not intend to use such technology. 26% already use open source, and 45% are thinking about using open source either throughout the company, or for a smaller project. The study determined that the “use of open source software appeared to be more common among smaller organizations, i.e., those with fewer than 50 employees and less than £10 million in revenue.”

While this is nice to hear, it only reflects part of the truth. Certainly, facing a slowing global economy, open source remains an essential alternative for companies seeking to reduce their costs. However, this is only one of the benefits - albeit the most common - attributable to open source.

Let’s look at some others, in no particular order:

  • Open source also gives control of the code to users and thus scalability.
  • Open source offers opportunities for customization that only an army of consultants could provide for a proprietary solution (and I’m not talking about the cost of implementation).
  • Open source standards-based technology facilitates the integration of other tools – open source or proprietary – and blends seamlessly into a company’s IT system.
  • Open source offers performance similar, or superior, to traditional solutions.
  • Open source is generally based on a community that participates in development and is involved in product improvement. The community also contributes to knowledge transfer via forums, wikis, or online courses.
  • Open source provides user-friendly features, designed for the majority of users.

Quite a lot, but this isn’t an exhaustive list. I haven’t mentioned reliability or security. And we have nothing to be ashamed of in these areas.

So, of course open source can help reduce business costs, but if you only think about it on that level, I don’t think many companies will rush to purchase.

Bertrand

17
Nov

Open source, twenty-four years later…

US Department of Defense recently released a memo, “Clarifying Guidance Regarding Open Source Software (OSS)”.

As FederalComputerWeek notes: this memo “puts open-source software on the same level as commercial software and urges DoD agencies to evaluate it on an equal basis with proprietary offering.Jay Liman, from the 451Group, explains it even more clearly: “The DoD memo wisely lays out the idea that open source software should be considered not alongside traditional, commercial offerings, but basically as traditional, commercial software offerings, so that the evaluation process is truly fair. Open source doesn’t fit in all circumstances, but it certainly does afford potential cost savings, flexibility and freedom in some situations, as noted in the memo.

Following the White House announcement of its choice of Drupal, these words “not alongside…but basically as” sound very, very good. I affirm that this announces a turning point for the open source community. Twenty-four years have gone by since the creation of the Free Software Foundation by Richard Stallman. For 24 years, the power of OSS made gradual inroads on enterprise information systems, with clear acceleration in the past five years. Today’s memo brings credibility to what we’ve been writing about on this blog all along: OSS is on the same level as traditional software. And it echoes what we already wrote on this blog : cost reduction is not the only benefit you can realize. Typical criticisms were around reliability, security, or performance. The DoD has shattered these false allegations.

I feel like a cyclist after climbing the first pass of the first mountain stage of the Tour de France - happy to have reached this goal, and yet focused on the next pass. I know that the entire OSS pack will face other huge challenges, but today I’m really happy to savor this victory.

Bertrand