Archive for September, 2009



07
Sep

Survey on open source use for business intelligence, data integration and data warehousing

Mark Madsen and the BeyeNETWORK are working on a research report on open source software (OSS) use for business intelligence, data integration and data warehousing. The focus is on how real-world organizations use or plan to use open source to store, analyze and deliver information. Through this report, expect to learn what OSS projects are most popular, what’s working in production and the reasons for success or failure in IT systems.

To prepare this report, Mark needs input from users of open source technologies.  Since Talend is sponsoring this report, we agreed to help Mark promote the survey he is currently running.

Please consider taking 5 minutes to participate. In addition to your help in shaping the results, you will receive the final research report and a $5 Amazon gift card…

Take this survey now:
http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/?p=WEB229FHNWQXDQ

Yves

04
Sep

Oracle, MySQL and the European Commission: isn’t it about Marketing?

The European Commission launched an antitrust probe into Oracle’s acquisition of Sun.  EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes expressed concerns about whether MySQL would continue to get traction under Oracle’s ownership.

Matt Asay makes the point that the EC’s “meddlesome muddling reveals a surprising ignorance of open source, and shows a complete disregard for MySQL’s true market opportunity”.  He argues that MySQL will continue to thrive, no matter which choices Oracle makes, and provides as proof some popular MySQL forks.

Matt Aslett said in a recent tweet “Oracle’s (potential) control of MySQL is not about the license but copyright (not that the EC seems to understand that).”

They are both right: Oracle cannot kill MySQL, even if they wanted to.

But they can hurt it badly.

Try something.  Type “open source database” in Google. Your results may vary depending on where you are located and your browser language, but chances are MySQL will appear in the sponsored links at the top (in my results, I also had EnterpriseDB).

Now, think about what will happen when Oracle says “spending freeze on online advertising”.  Or when Larry Elison says “the Google guys have a bigger airplane than me – no more money for them” (since Larry Page and Sergey Brin own a Boeing 767, that’s a real possibility…)

MySQL – the company – has been investing heavily in the promotion of MySQL – the database.  And this contributed a lot to the adoption of the technology. I am not saying the MySQL project will die without marketing. But it will loose traction, and another leader will emerge.  Will it be a MySQL fork/derivative, or another open source database?  I don’t know.

I am not sure that the EC has the right reasons in mind for investigating the deal.  But they are right, Oracle can badly damage MySQL.

Yves

UPDATE: Matt Aslett expanded his thoughts on copyright ownership on the 451 CAOS Theory blog, explaining that “Oracle’s impending ownership of MySQL could theoretically have a significant impact on the emerging market for commercial products based on MySQL and their ability to compete with the Oracle Database.”   Another element to consider.

Is the EU right in blocking the deal but for the wrong reasons – because they don’t get it?

01
Sep

A moment of truth: Informatica’s pricing revealed

I want to thank eWeek for the moment of truth it offers in its article: Informatica Launches Data Integration Service in the Cloud. To my knowledge, it’s the first article that discusses Informatica’s fee structure!

At last, the leader of proprietary data integration communicates its licensing prices via Girish Pancha, Informatica’s Vice President and General Manager of Data Integration.

What do we learn from this article? Truly, nothing new! But we do get official confirmation that Informatica’s products are expensive and out of reach of most enterprises’ budget – $165,000 “base price” for their solution! And that’s without considering connectors, additional CPU runtime licenses, and all the extra stuff they charge for throughout the life of your project.

Commercial open source software vendors like Talend are positioning their products along other lines that simple economics. The question of budget is important, of course, but openness, high performance, scalability, community-driven, etc, are other strategic attributes. Of course, with this kind of article all our efforts go up in smoke…
Bertrand